In the time since I started this blog, I have not been remotely political in my writing. Neither, in case you’re worried, am I planning to suddenly ask you to support a certain party or agree with me on certain policies. However, I feel I need to ensure that you, the readers are aware of the importance of considering the Digital Economy Act (formerly Bill) in placing your vote this May 6th.
The Digital Economy Bill (DEB), sponsored through the Houses of Parliament by Lord Mandelson, was a bill designed to tackle the technological issues concerning our lives today. It attempted to address such issues as orphaned copyright works, online piracy, and video-game age ratings.
The DEB gained Royal Assent on April 12th, becoming the Digital Economy Act (DEA), following discussion in the house of commons.
Now I will happily acknowledge that the issues tackled in the DEA are important, and that they must indeed be discussed, preferably at length. However, the problem with the DEA is the lack of interest shown to it during its progress through the houses.
Photographers campaigned to have the clauses on orphaned works changed, and were successful in their endeavours to have Clause 43 removed. The Open Rights Group campaigned against the web-blocking and forced disconnection parts of the bill, designed to stop online piracy, and failed, bringing these measures into law, a law which comes into force on the 12th of June.
I may disagree with many of the measures proposed within the DEA. I may even think there was a certain amount of bias between Lord Mandelson, the bill’s sponsor, and big business. However, I am not writing about this to encourage you to agree with me, am writing about it to make sure you think for yourself.
The DEA was passed through the House of Commons during parliamentary “wash-up”, a period during the dying days of an out-going parliament, defined by Wikipedia as “last few days while a Parliament of the United Kingdom continues to sit after the Prime Minister has announced the date when Parliament will be dissolved” where “the Government attempts to pass unfinished business which has sufficient all-party support”. It is during this period that governments may pass non-contentious laws which they feel would be better in law before the election, and which have the support to succeed. Clearly, with the measures proposed in the DEA, it should be given more scrutiny than this, especially given how many MPs were actually present during the reading. As you will see here, there were 184 Conservative MPs absent, 45 Liberal Democrats, and 139 Labour MPs, not to mention the smaller parties. I believe laws such as the DEA should be given a full discussion in the commons, a view voiced by most of the MPs who voted against the bill during wash-up.
The Open Rights Group has been running a campaign to encourage voters to email their parliamentary candidates, asking for their views on the way the DEA was passed and whether they would seek further action should they be elected. I, for my part, set up a small blog on my server to bring together some of these replies. You can find it at http://debill.alitheg.co.uk
As I have stated previously, I do not ask that you support the same party as me. Neither do I ask that you agree with my political views. Instead, I ask that you do 3 things before you place your ‘X’ on a piece of paper on Thursday, May 6th:
- Inform yourself, get the facts.
- Make your own decisions. The only wasted vote is a vote not placed.
- Think.